Missouri and Child Support

Child Support Enforcement Office Is Fraught With Errors, says State Auditor
"Noncustodial parents may not be as much of a deadbeat as the state claims." Says State Auditor Susan Montee
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- State Auditor Susan Montee said Thursday that Missouri's child support enforcement office is fraught with sloppy record-keeping, meaning some noncustodial parents may not be as much of a deadbeat as the state claims.
"It's extremely sloppy," Montee told reporters at a Capitol news conference. "It's a total inattention to making sure these numbers are right."Montee expressed concern that some parents could have child support enforcement actions taken against them -- such as automatic deductions from their paychecks or the revocation of passports -- based on faulty information. But she cited no specific cases where that occurred.The Department of Social Services, which oversees child support collections through its Family Support Division, said it recently has improved the accuracy of arrears tracked in its computerized system.
Rather, auditors randomly examined 209 cases from a pool of 187,033 in which their arrears totaled more than $1,000. Auditors said they did not focus on cases with lesser debts because those typically were just a month or two behind.
Of those sample cases, the amount shown as owed was incorrect 27 percent of the time, the audit said. That included 35 cases in which the amount listed as owed was overstated by anywhere from $1 to $35,432 and 22 cases in which the amount shown as owed was understated by anywhere from $10 to $12,820, the audit said.Applying the error rate from the sampling to the larger pool of 187,033 cases, the audit projected that about 51,000 cases could have errors.Auditors also examined 35 cases with arrears of more than $100,000 and found that 22 of those had incorrect balances owed. Fourteen overstated the debt, including two that were off by about $454,000. Eight understated the debt, including one by $54,691, the audit said.All the errors that auditors found were corrected by the department, Montee said.She described the mistakes as human errors, not computer malfunctions.In some cases, court judgments setting or changing the amount owed by noncustodial parents had not been entered into the computer, either accurately or at all, the audit said. For example, a judge reduced a parent's debt from $309,000 to $84,347 in June 2006 but the change was not entered into the computer until January 2007 after auditors caught the error, the report said. In another case, an April 2003 judgment reducing a parent's debt was not entered into the computer by department staff until March 2007.Other examples of errors included calculating a parent's obligation on a weekly instead of biweekly amount, which increased the supposed debt; failing to note when child support payments were to end, which resulted in the continued accumulation of alleged debt; and failing to reduce parents' debt when a 10-year statute of limitations prevented it from being collected.